agile3
Compare

Scrum vs Kanban

Fixed sprints and roles, or continuous flow with WIP limits? How to choose, and when to blend them.

2 min read · Beginner

In 30 seconds

  • Scrum works in fixed sprints with defined roles and events.
  • Kanban works in continuous flow, limiting work in progress.
  • Pick by how your work arrives: planned batches or a steady stream.

Pick Scrum when…

  • Work can be planned a couple of weeks ahead
  • The team builds a product with regular releases
  • You want a clear rhythm of planning, review and reflection

Pick Kanban when…

  • Work arrives unpredictably (support, operations)
  • Priorities change daily
  • You want to improve the current process without reorganizing roles

Side by side

ScrumKanban
CadenceFixed sprintsContinuous flow
RolesProduct Owner, Scrum Master, DevelopersNone required
Limits work bySprint scopeWIP limits per column
Change mid-cycleProtected Sprint GoalAny time, if capacity allows
Key metricVelocityLead time, throughput

Blending them

Many teams run Scrum events with a Kanban board and WIP limits, sometimes called Scrumban. That's fine, as long as the team is clear on why each practice is there.

Myth vs reality

Myth · Kanban is Scrum without rules.
Reality · Kanban has its own discipline: explicit policies and WIP limits.
Myth · Scrum teams can't use Kanban boards.
Reality · Many do; the board is a tool, not a framework.
Myth · Kanban is only for operations.
Reality · Product teams use it too, especially with continuous delivery.

FAQ

Which is easier to start?

Kanban, because it starts from your current process. Scrum needs role and event changes.

Which is better for estimates?

Scrum teams often estimate in points; Kanban teams forecast from throughput. Both can forecast well.

Can we switch later?

Yes. Teams often start with one and adapt toward the other as their work changes.